NanoMTEB-BR
Overview#
NanoMTEB-BR is the compact Brazilian Portuguese retrieval group derived from the six native Retrieval tasks in MTEB-BR. It covers Brazilian tax law, higher-education and central-bank FAQs, federal audit-court case law, medical question answering, and general passage retrieval. Unlike translated benchmark copies, all six tasks originate from Brazilian Portuguese sources. The group therefore tests whether a retrieval model handles local legal and institutional language, domain terminology, question-to-answer matching, and semantically related passages across corpora that range from a few hundred documents to 10,000-document hard-negative pools.
What This Group Measures#
The six tasks expose different relevance relations within one language. FAQ and medical tasks retrieve answer-bearing text for natural questions. The legal tasks retrieve statutes, rulings, or case-law material whose relevant passages may share specialized terminology without repeating the question. Quati tests general passage retrieval with native Brazilian Portuguese queries and hard negatives.
This mix makes the group useful for separating broad Portuguese semantic quality from domain-specific retrieval behavior. A model can perform well on short institutional FAQs while struggling with long or terminology-heavy legal documents, or it can retrieve general passages well without ranking concise medical answers accurately.
Task Families#
- Tax-law retrieval: BRTaxQAR maps Brazilian tax questions to relevant statutes, regulations, administrative rulings, and related legal sources.
- Higher-education FAQ retrieval: FaQuADIR retrieves answers about Brazilian higher-education institutions and services.
- Central-bank FAQ retrieval: FaqBacenRetrieval retrieves public information from Banco Central do Brasil.
- Public-sector case-law retrieval: JurisTCU retrieves Tribunal de Contas da União rulings from a hard-negative legal corpus.
- Medical QA retrieval: MedPTRetrieval retrieves Brazilian Portuguese answers for health and medical questions.
- General passage retrieval: Quati retrieves relevant native Brazilian Portuguese passages from a hard-negative corpus.
Dataset Shape#
| Task | Domain | Queries | Documents | Positive qrels |
BRTaxQAR | Brazilian tax law | 200 | 461 | 546 |
FaQuADIR | Higher-education FAQ | 200 | 243 | 201 |
FaqBacenRetrieval | Central-bank FAQ | 200 | 1,654 | 201 |
JurisTCU | Federal audit-court case law | 150 | 10,000 | 1,711 |
MedPTRetrieval | Medical question answering | 200 | 500 | 204 |
Quati | General passage retrieval | 49 | 10,000 | 892 |
All tasks use Brazilian Portuguese (pt) queries and documents. The FAQ and medical tasks have relatively small document pools and are close to single-positive retrieval. JurisTCU and Quati use larger hard-negative pools and many relevant passages for some queries, so their scores should not be interpreted as the same retrieval problem at a different scale.
Evaluation and Interpretation#
NanoMTEB-BR is a dedicated viewer scope and contributes six tasks to a complete HAKARI-Bench evaluation. Like other language-focused NanoMTEB suites, it is not an additional canonical Overall component; the six result files are still evaluated, stored, and available for direct comparison.
The initial validation compared 29 models that had complete results on both the official MTEB-BR Retrieval suite and NanoMTEB-BR. Ranking the models across the same six tasks produced a Spearman correlation of 0.9860 and a Kendall correlation of 0.9320. Twenty-eight of the 29 models remained within two Borda rank positions. This supports using NanoMTEB-BR as a close rank-preserving proxy for model comparison, while absolute scores remain specific to the smaller Nano corpora and query samples.
Training and Leakage Notes#
Useful training data includes non-overlapping Brazilian Portuguese FAQ pairs, medical QA, legal question-to-passage examples, public-sector search logs, and general passage-retrieval supervision. Hard negatives should come from the same institution or domain and share terminology while answering a different question.
Training and validation pipelines should exclude the Nano evaluation queries, qrels, positive documents, and overlapping upstream test records. Legal and institutional sources can contain repeated templates or near-duplicate text, so document-level deduplication alone may not prevent leakage.
Public Sources#
- MTEB-BR: A Text Embedding Benchmark for Brazilian Portuguese, 2026.
- MTEB-BR source repository.
- BRTaxQAR source paper.
- FaQuAD source paper.
- FaqBacen source paper.
- JurisTCU source paper.
- MedPT source paper.
- Quati source paper.
- NanoMTEB-BR dataset.
Metadata Summary#
| Field | Value |
| Task pages | 6 |
| Queries | 999 |
| Split-local documents | 22,858 |
| Positive qrels | 3,755 |
| Languages | pt |
| Categories | natural_language |
| Positives / query avg | 3.76 |
Task Metadata Summary#
| Task | Backing dataset | Lang | Category | Queries | Docs | Positives | BM25 nDCG@10 | Dense nDCG@10 | Reranking hybrid nDCG@10 | Best profile |
| BRTaxQAR | NanoMTEB-BR | pt | natural_language | 200 | 461 | 546 | 0.4650 | 0.2842 | 0.3810 | BM25 |
| FaqBacenRetrieval | NanoMTEB-BR | pt | natural_language | 200 | 1,654 | 201 | 0.4717 | 0.6577 | 0.5858 | Dense |
| FaQuADIR | NanoMTEB-BR | pt | natural_language | 200 | 243 | 201 | 0.8870 | 0.8425 | 0.8779 | BM25 |
| JurisTCU | NanoMTEB-BR | pt | natural_language | 150 | 10,000 | 1,711 | 0.4688 | 0.5227 | 0.5490 | Reranking hybrid |
| MedPTRetrieval | NanoMTEB-BR | pt | natural_language | 200 | 500 | 204 | 0.4328 | 0.6974 | 0.5975 | Dense |
| Quati | NanoMTEB-BR | pt | natural_language | 49 | 10,000 | 892 | 0.3815 | 0.6494 | 0.5202 | Dense |